{"id":34012,"date":"2017-05-07T15:44:49","date_gmt":"2017-05-07T22:44:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spijue.wpengine.com\/news\/why-redundancy-should-be-removed-from-the-mining-ordinance\/"},"modified":"2017-05-07T15:44:49","modified_gmt":"2017-05-07T22:44:49","slug":"why-redundancy-should-be-removed-from-the-mining-ordinance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/opinion\/why-redundancy-should-be-removed-from-the-mining-ordinance\/","title":{"rendered":"Why redundancy should be removed from the mining ordinance"},"content":{"rendered":"
In 2010, then-Mayor Bruce Botelho appointed a committee to consider the conditions under which the City and Borough of Juneau would promote development of the Alaska-Juneau Mine. The committee concluded that an alternative water source to Gold Creek was an essential first requirement. Stated another way, the committee said that, without a new alternative water source, the CBJ should not promote development of the AJ Mine. Conversely, providing an alternative water source does not mean that the AJ Mine will be reopened. That alternative water source, which has the capability to supply all of Juneau, has now been completed at Salmon Creek. This pre-condition had to be met for the committee report to support the promotion of the AJ.<\/span><\/p>\n In the same way, removing the duplicate permitting processes from the mining ordinance is a prerequisite to opening the AJ Mine. No operator would accept the delay, expense and extra avenues for litigation caused by the extra permitting processes in the mining ordinance. As with constructing an alternative water source, removing the duplicate permitting processes from the mining ordinance does not mean that the AJ Mine will be reopened \u2014 only that a barrier to doing so has been removed.<\/p>\n