{"id":37912,"date":"2018-11-01T17:51:00","date_gmt":"2018-11-02T01:51:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/begich-dunleavy-stand-at-dividend-divide-in-final-debate\/"},"modified":"2018-11-01T17:51:00","modified_gmt":"2018-11-02T01:51:00","slug":"begich-dunleavy-stand-at-dividend-divide-in-final-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/home\/begich-dunleavy-stand-at-dividend-divide-in-final-debate\/","title":{"rendered":"Begich, Dunleavy stand at dividend divide in final debate"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Alaska Permanent Fund wasn’t physically present, but it shared the stage with Alaska’s two leading candidates for governor in their final debate for the general election.<\/p>\n
Mark Begich and Mike Dunleavy used the hourlong event hosted by KTVA-TV to share their opinions on crime and on the fund. The candidates’ plans for the fund differ sharply and are some of the biggest differences between the two.<\/p>\n
“Alaska is at a turning point, a crossroads,” Dunleavy said.<\/p>\n
In the debate, he said he would seek to restore the traditional formula for distributing the Permanent Fund Dividend and would retroactively compensate Alaskans for prior cuts. Incumbent Gov. Bill Walker vetoed half the 2016 Permanent Fund Dividend<\/a>, and the Alaska Legislature cut it in 2017 and 2018.<\/p>\n Dunleavy said Thursday night that he will pay Alaskans that money using approximately $6 billion from the Permanent Fund’s earnings reserve. While most of the $64 billion fund<\/a> is constitutionally protected and cannot be spent without a vote of the people, $17 billion of its total is in the earnings reserve account, an unprotected portion that can be spent with a majority vote in the Legislature.<\/p>\n Dunleavy proposes taking $6 billion from that unprotected earnings reserve and giving it to Alaskans.<\/p>\n “I believe with $19 billion in the earnings reserve, we can pay out a full dividend,” Dunleavy said, slightly misstating the amount of the earnings reserve.<\/p>\n “What I hear here is a gimmick and a slogan,” Begich said.<\/p>\n “It’s not a gimmick,” Dunleavy responded.<\/p>\n The Dunleavy approach to the dividend has some side effects, Begich said.<\/p>\n “Under Mike’s plan, he has no inflation proofing which means long-term problems for the sustainability of the plan,” the Democratic candidate said.<\/p>\n