{"id":3853,"date":"2018-04-13T23:30:00","date_gmt":"2018-04-14T06:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spijue.wpengine.com\/news\/house-struggles-could-risk-permanent-fund-corp-in-long-term\/"},"modified":"2018-04-13T23:30:00","modified_gmt":"2018-04-14T06:30:00","slug":"house-struggles-could-risk-permanent-fund-corp-in-long-term","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/house-struggles-could-risk-permanent-fund-corp-in-long-term\/","title":{"rendered":"House struggles could risk Permanent Fund Corp. in long term"},"content":{"rendered":"
Correction: A quote about divisions within the House Majority, previously attributed to House Majority Leader Chris Tuck, should have been attributed to Speaker of the House Bryce Edgmon.<\/em><\/p>\n As the Alaska Legislature careens toward the end of its 2018 regular session, the head of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation is urging lawmakers to put brakes on their ability to spend from the fund.<\/p>\n A divided Alaska House of Representatives may not be able to deliver.<\/p>\n In a talk with reporters Friday, Speaker of the House Bryce Edgmon, D-Dillingham, said his 21-member caucus is having problems reaching agreement on a plan to draw money from the fund. Rep. Neal Foster, D-Nome and the lead negotiator for the House Majority, concurred with Edgmon\u2019s assessment.<\/p>\n Since last year, the coalition House Majority has pushed a budget-balancing plan that includes modest cuts, increased oil taxes, a state income tax, and spending from the Permanent Fund. The Senate has rejected changes to oil taxes and an income tax<\/a>, which leaves the House Majority faced with the choice of a budgetary deadlock (and potential government shutdown) or using the Permanent Fund alone.<\/p>\n \u201cOur caucus, we did not seek \u2014 in terms of filling to the fiscal gap \u2014 to pursue a Permanent Fund-only solution, so we\u2019re still struggling \u2026 and we don\u2019t have a unified position on it,\u201d Edgmon said.<\/p>\n House Majority Leader Chris Tuck, D-Anchorage, suggested that language in this year\u2019s budget is just as good as long-term rules constraining Permanent Fund spending.<\/p>\n \u201cAs long as we\u2019re behaving in a structured draw this year, I think that\u2019s the most important thing,\u201d Tuck said.<\/p>\n \u201cIt is not the same,\u201d said Angela Rodell, director of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation, by phone.<\/p>\n \u201cIt is an ad-hoc draw because there is nothing written in agreement between the House, the Senate and the governor.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIt only constitutes a rule for this budget, for this year,\u201d she said, then asked: What happens when lawmakers return next year?<\/p>\n