{"id":39684,"date":"2018-12-10T10:51:00","date_gmt":"2018-12-10T19:51:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/court-invalidates-four-timber-sales-in-tongass-national-forest\/"},"modified":"2018-12-10T10:51:00","modified_gmt":"2018-12-10T19:51:00","slug":"court-invalidates-four-timber-sales-in-tongass-national-forest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/home\/court-invalidates-four-timber-sales-in-tongass-national-forest\/","title":{"rendered":"Court invalidates four timber sales in Tongass National Forest"},"content":{"rendered":"
A federal court invalidated four U.S. Forest Service logging projects in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest, ending a decade-long legal struggle with environmental groups.<\/p>\n
Timber sales included in the lawsuit were Scott Peak (on Kupreanof Island), Overlook (on Mitkof Island), Traitors Cove (on Revillagigedo Island) and Soda Nick (on Prince of Wales Island). Together the four projects would have cut 33 million board feet of timber from 1,700 acres of old-growth forest. About 14 miles of logging roads would have been constructed. Two of the four projects were scheduled to be logged in 2019.<\/p>\n
“The court’s decision came just in time,” said Gabriel Scott, in-house counsel for Cascadia Wildlands Project, one of the plaintiffs, in a press release.<\/p>\n
But Buck Lindekugel, a grassroots attorney for Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (SEACC), said the Nov. 28 decision against the USFS sends an alarming message to citizens.<\/p>\n
“The reason there are all these laws, the National Environmental Policy Act, the National Forest Management Act, the Tongass Timber Reform Act, is to direct the agencies on how to manage public lands,” Lindekugel said. “When agencies take shortcuts … that results in them making mistakes and they get called on them, they’re supposed to fix them. That’s what Congress intended. That’s what the American people depend on.”<\/p>\n
At issue in the case was how the USFS determined the impacts of the logging projects on Sitka black-tailed deer, and consequently wolves and hunters. The 9th District Court for the District of Alaska in Anchorage found that the agency’s modeling of deer winter habitat “does not accurately measure forest structure [and] was too unreliable to be used,” the court said in its decision. The court further stated that the “USFS failed to explain why it was authorizing the projects despite lower-than-recommended deer habitat capabilities.”<\/p>\n