{"id":44609,"date":"2019-03-14T11:20:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-14T19:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/bill-would-roll-back-part-of-conflict-of-interest-law\/"},"modified":"2019-03-14T14:30:45","modified_gmt":"2019-03-14T22:30:45","slug":"bill-would-roll-back-part-of-conflict-of-interest-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/bill-would-roll-back-part-of-conflict-of-interest-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Bill would roll back part of conflict of interest law"},"content":{"rendered":"
Lawmakers were taken by surprise this past fall when they learned a bill they passed would actually make their jobs much more difficult.<\/p>\n
On Nov. 1, the Legislature’s select committee on legislative ethics interpreted a conflict of interest law (House<\/a> Bill <\/a>44<\/a>) as much more restrictive<\/a> than even the bill’s main sponsor thought it would be. The committee interpreted the bill as saying that if a legislator declared a conflict of interest about a bill or topic, they couldn’t have private conversations about that topic.<\/p>\n Former Rep. Jason Grenn, who sponsored the bill, said in an interview Thursday that he was “disheartened” that the law ended up being so restrictive.<\/p>\n “At no time during the hearings in the House or the Senate did (legislative legal or legislative ethics committees) ever bring up that this potentially would be their interpretation,” Grenn said. “We worked with them, obviously, when we drafted the bill, and wanted to make sure it fit with what our intentions were.”<\/p>\n