{"id":44987,"date":"2019-03-21T03:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-21T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/opinion\/opinion-alaska-cant-afford-reckless-rhetoric-on-pebble-mine\/"},"modified":"2019-03-21T12:53:04","modified_gmt":"2019-03-21T20:53:04","slug":"opinion-alaska-cant-afford-reckless-rhetoric-on-pebble-mine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/opinion\/opinion-alaska-cant-afford-reckless-rhetoric-on-pebble-mine\/","title":{"rendered":"Opinion: Alaska can’t afford reckless rhetoric on Pebble Mine"},"content":{"rendered":"
My friend and fellow fisherman, Everett Thompson, and I agree on many things, and as Alaskans we also disagree on things, too. Most recently, he wrote a My Turn for the Empire on March 15<\/a> against the new leadership of the federal and state environmental agencies.<\/p>\n The headline to his article — “Alaska can’t afford careless oversight of mines” — libels the hard-working staff at the range of regulatory agencies responsible for reviewing, regulating and ultimately approving a mine at Pebble, should it meet all standards and criteria for responsible development in Alaska. The last time I checked, the law is the law. This means that any potential proponent of development must meet the criteria, spelled out in statute, before a project can advance. It also means that a company must comply with the rules or face revocation of its permits to operate.<\/p>\n I can say with certainty that the state of Alaska is not going to “rubber stamp” permits for Pebble. Each agency will do its diligence and review permit applications it receives. They will analyze the technical and environmental information presented by the applicant to determine if it meets the agency’s requirements. But don’t take my word for it — do your homework and ask the people who regulate if they just “rubber stamp” the things they work on.<\/p>\n