{"id":49195,"date":"2019-06-10T06:30:00","date_gmt":"2019-06-10T14:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/capitol-live-budget-on-the-verge-of-going-to-governor\/"},"modified":"2019-06-10T15:27:56","modified_gmt":"2019-06-10T23:27:56","slug":"capitol-live-budget-on-the-verge-of-going-to-governor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/capitol-live-budget-on-the-verge-of-going-to-governor\/","title":{"rendered":"Capitol Live: Senate split on dividend continues"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\t\t\t\t
3:27 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Wow, the resolution passes. It looks like Sens. Donny Olson and Lyman Hoffman flipped their votes from the previous vote. Gray-Jackson also flipped around, but the other two outweigh her.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Here’s how they voted:<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Stedman yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Stevens yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Von Imhof yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Wielechowski no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Wilson no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Begich yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Birch yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Bishop yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Coghill yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Costello no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Gray-Jackson no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Hoffman yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Hughes no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Kawasaki no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Kiehl yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Micciche no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Olson yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Reinbold no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Shower no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Giessel yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 3:18 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Sen. Natasha von Imhof, R-Anchorage, has been a quote machine as of late, and she’s still firing on all cylinders. She says, “I don’t know what the heck day it is. It’s day ‘a lot.’” She says she keeps hearing that Alaskans around the state are focused on the PFD. She disagrees.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “Actually, the people in this room are focused on the PFD,” von Imhof says.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t She says it’s time to take a different approach. She’s in favor of this.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 3:12 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Sen. David Wilson, R-Wasilla, is also speaking against this working group. These conversations shouldn’t be happening behind closed doors, Wilson says.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “The working group is not a good idea.” he says. “Period.”<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 3:10 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Sen. Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage, says he thinks it’s futile for legislators to keep debating.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “I see us as a deadlock and I believe the way forward is a vote of the people,” he says.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 3:04 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Senators now talking about the resolution as a whole. This seems as divisive as any other PFD-related debate. Reinbold is passionate once again, even going as far as comparing this working group to another working group in 2014 that made recommendations that eventually led to Senate Bill 91. That draws an objection from Coghill, who says that’s off topic and casting aspersions about other lawmakers present. Giessel agrees.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 2:56 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t You’ll never guess what just happened. It’s a 10-10 vote. The amendment fails. No guarantee of a statutory dividend this year.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Here’s how they voted:<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Shower yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Stedman no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Stevens no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Von Imhof no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Wielechowski yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Wilson yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Begich no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Birch no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Bishop no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Coghill no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Costello yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Gray-Jackson no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Hoffman yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Hughes yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Kawasaki yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Kiehl no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Micciche yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Olson yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Reinbold yes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Giessel no<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 2:53 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Sen. Reinbold rises again, saying they don’t need this working group.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “We already have a working group,” Reinbold says. “It has 40 members,” she says, likely referring to the Senate, which has 20 members. But her point is that the Legislature has already been talking about this and a separate working group isn’t necessary.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Senate President Cathy Giessel makes a quick note.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “For the record, let it be noted that this is the Senate and we have 20 members,” Giessel says.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 2:44 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t We’re underway here. The Senate is taking up the House’s resolution that would form a working group to look at the long-term future of the Permanent Fund.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “You have to look as far over the horizon as you can,” Sen. John Coghill, R-North Pole, says.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Senate Majority Leader Mia Costello, R-Anchorage, proposes an amendment to this resolution that would require the state to pay a full statutory dividend (so $3,000 this year) until the state passes a bill into law to address the long-term future of the dividend.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 2:10 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t The Senate’s floor session has been pushed back and back and it sounds like it will take place at 2:30 p.m.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 1:18 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t We’ll have a fuller story on this later, but a few thoughts from Alaska Municipal League’s Nils Andreassen, sent to the Empire this morning:<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t • The budget passed by the Legislature is very supportive of local governments, economic development and the resilience of Alaskans<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t • AML is encouraged by the promises kept with the inclusion of funding for school bond debt reimbursement and shared fish taxes<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t • AML is concerned that the cuts to the ferry system represent an erosion of service that threatens the future sustainability of affordable, dependable public transportation for residents who rely on it<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t • The uncertainty around FY20 education funding is challenging not just for school districts, but municipalities responsible for contributing to that education<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t • The threat of vetoes doesn’t strengthen Alaska, and we encourage the governor to continue working with the legislature and local government leaders on solutions that do<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 12:25 <\/strong>p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Thoughts from Senate Minority Leader Tom Begich, via a statement:<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “We realize the amount of the Dividend prevented the passage of the budget, and the best way to finalize the Dividend is through a special session solely devoted to the matter. But ultimately, the Dividend must be protected through a constitutional amendment. Until then, the legislature will continue to debate its size, preventing us from concluding our work on behalf of Alaskans.”<\/em><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 12:02 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t For what it’s worth, Sen. Elvi Gray-Jackson — who voted for a $3,000 dividend last week but voted today not to try to revive that bill — declined an interview request immediately after the floor session. She said she might be available later in the day.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 11:58 a.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Speaking to reporters after the floor session, Stedman said he believes it is “very, very, very unlikely” that the Legislature will agree on a PFD amount by the end of the special session Friday. He says the state will have to agree on a dividend by Sept. 1, not by October. So a somewhat tighter timeline there than I thought.<\/p>\n