{"id":49321,"date":"2019-06-12T13:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-06-12T21:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/group-of-legislators-wants-to-take-emotional-debate-out-of-permanent-fund\/"},"modified":"2019-06-12T13:00:00","modified_gmt":"2019-06-12T21:00:00","slug":"group-of-legislators-wants-to-take-emotional-debate-out-of-permanent-fund","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/group-of-legislators-wants-to-take-emotional-debate-out-of-permanent-fund\/","title":{"rendered":"Group of legislators wants to take ‘emotional debate’ out of Permanent Fund"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\t\t\t\t
Recent history repeated itself Wednesday.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
In the House on Wednesday, Rep. Dave Talerico, R-Healy, proposed including a $3,000 PFD<\/a> in this year’s capital budget. After hours of debate where nearly every present representative spoke, the proposal failed, 21-15. That vote came days after the Senate also failed<\/a> to agree on a PFD amount.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t On Wednesday morning, the Permanent Fund working group held its first gathering, with the eventual goal of finding an agreeable future for Permanent Fund earnings and the dividend.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t There wasn’t much to see in the first meeting, but the co-chairs of the group outlined what they’ll be doing in the next few weeks. The working group, which includes four senators and four representatives, will come up with recommendations for the Alaska Legislature about everything relating to the Permanent Fund — how to allocate money within the fund long-term, how much the dividend will be worth this year and whether they need to change the formula for calculating the dividend.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t