{"id":50817,"date":"2019-07-20T05:35:00","date_gmt":"2019-07-20T13:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/capitol-live-its-a-working-weekend-on-this-special-session-saturday\/"},"modified":"2019-07-20T16:56:18","modified_gmt":"2019-07-21T00:56:18","slug":"capitol-live-its-a-working-weekend-on-this-special-session-saturday","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/capitol-live-its-a-working-weekend-on-this-special-session-saturday\/","title":{"rendered":"Capitol Live: House Finance Committee sets up Sunday to be a big day"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\t\t\t\t
Summary: <\/strong>The Senate passed a capital budget and “reverse sweep” bill today, and the House Finance Committee voted to move it out of committee. Since the bill involves spending out of the Constitutional Budget Reserve, a super majority vote will be needed. Both the Senate and House are set to adjourn tomorrow afternoon.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 4:48 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Rep. Dan Ortiz, I-Ketchikan, motioned to move the bill out of committee.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t By a 7-3 vote, the bill was moved out of committee.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Merrick, Sullivan-Leonard and Tilton voted against it.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t The House Finance Committee will next meet tomorrow at 10 a.m.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 4:40 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Rep. Adam Wool, D-Fairbanks, asked about the history of the sweep and reverse sweep.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Teal said it’s been a thing since the early ’90s, and it only occurs when money is owed to the CBR. He said there was no sweep for several years in the mid ’10s.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “In every year there has been a sweep, there has been a reverse sweep,” Teal said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Sullivan-Leonard asked why there would be a preference for spending directly from the CBR rather than using the general fund.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Teal said spending at a debt from the general fund is effectively the same as spending from the CBR.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Sullivan-Leonard asked for the present balance of both the general fund and CBR.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Teal said it’s currently zero.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “We have not had an end-of-year general fund balance for years,” Teal said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t The end balance of the CBR is slightly over $2 billion in cash and over $14 billion including money the state owes itself.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 4:30 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Merrick asked if it might be possible to fund some of the more urgent things impacted by the sweep with unrestricted general funds and address the reverse sweep with legislation at a later date.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Johnston said the longer things the more complicated accounting becomes.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t However, Merrick said complicated accounting might be preferable to leaving some programs without funds.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 4:20 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Teal said one of the risks of sweeping multiple funds is losing the ability to accrue interest that helps pay for programs.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “It’s those two funds that are the driver,” Teal said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 4:10 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Rep. Bart LeBon, R-Fairbanks, asked Teal to explain the concept of the sweep and why a reverse sweep matters.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “Some of it is long term, some of it is hypothetical and some of it is urgent and very early,” Teal said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t He said a vaccine evaluation fund wouldn’t be missed until there was some kind of outbreak, but the higher education fund is something that will have an impact within the coming weeks.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “I think the higher education fund is kind of the best example of why to reverse the sweep as quickly as possible,” Teal said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Merrick asked if there are projects in the bill being discussed that are funded by the CBR that would normally be funded by the general fund.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t The answer was yes.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 4 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Rep. Neal Foster, D-Nome, said he thought Alaskans have plainly voiced support for a reverse sweep, which is why taking a second stab at the vote is imperative.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “If we don’t achieve a reverse sweep, then we won’t see power cost equalization,” Foster said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 3:50 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Rep. Kelly Merrick, R-Eagle River, asked why representatives were called back to Juneau to vote on a bill that’s nearly identical to a bill that was widely supported but fell short of a three-fourths vote required to draw from the CBR.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Merrick said she came to Juneau to compromise and the bill is not a compromise.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Johnston said in light of concern about the lack of a reverse sweep it’s hoped the vote goes differently this time around.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Rep. Colleen Sullivan-Leonard, R-Wasilla, said she’s “mad as heck” about being away from her hometown to be in Juneau considering a bill that isn’t a compromise.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “It’s moving backwards,” she said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 3:45 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Rep. Any Josephson, D-Anchorage, asked if there has been “head room” as high as $500 million, which is what he recalled the total being in 2015.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Teal said in the past the total has fallen between $500 million and $100 million in the past.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 3:35 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Rep. Cathy Tilton, R-Wasilla, is asking about language included in the bill that would allow funding for deficits created by appropriation bills to come from the CBR.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Tilton would like to avoid future bills creating large draws.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Legislative Finance Director David Teal said that section of the bill is complex, and language could be added to prevent future large draws.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Tilton also asked about the $250 million in “head room” and why it was needed if deficit funding was also part of the bill.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Johnston and her staff said the deficit filling language is for managing appropriations that have been made while the “head room” allows for future appropriations that may be required because of wild fires and earthquakes.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 3:20 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Johnston, co-chair of the finance committee, has come out swinging in favor of the bill, which she said would make Alaska safer.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 3:15 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Representatives are taking seats for the House Finance meeting. This should be the last meeting of the day and set the stage for what the Legislature will be voting on tomorrow.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 2:45 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t The House is adjourned until 1 p.m. tomorrow, so a reverse sweep and capital budget won’t be heading to the governor today. The Finance Committee will talk more about the bill passed by the Senate earlier today in about 30 minutes.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 2:40 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t The motion has been adopted.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Johnston announced the House Finance Committee will meet at 3:15 p.m.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 2:30 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t There’s been an at ease to allow for a flurry of discussion about the motion.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t It will be interesting to see what happens.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t This could wind up being a long day.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 2:20 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Rep. Jennifer Johnston, R-Anchorage, made a motion to waive a rule and add SB 2002, the Senate’s “reverse sweep” capital budget bill, to today’s House Finance Committee meeting.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 2 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t The House bells are ringing and representatives are making their way to the chambers.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t It’s likely SB2002 will be referred to the House Finance Committee. It’s possible this isn’t the last trip to the House floor for today, but things would need to move especially quick for that to happen.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 1:40 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Hoffman moved the Senate be adjourned until 2 p.m. tomorrow.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 1:35 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t There was a unanimous 19-0 vote to substitute the Senate’s bill for the governor’s bill; an 18-1 vote for the effective dates of the vote and a unanimous vote for the CBR portions of the bill.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t The bill will now go to the house. It needs a three-fourths vote to pass.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 1:30 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Sen. Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage, said the bill being debate is similar to the one that passed with unanimous support more than a month ago.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “The consequences of not reversing that sweep are pretty stunning and not what many anticipated,” Wielechowski said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t He said that’s because there’s a “new interpretation” of what can be swept.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “Some of the consequences of not passing this, we do not have funding for our crime bill,” Wielechowski said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Plus, he said power cost in rural Alaska would sky rocket because the Power Cost Equalization fund could be swept.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t The House Finance Committee’s meeting is delayed to the call of the chair. That could be to enable the committee to move along the Senate’s capital budget.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 1:20 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “There is no subversive or secretive issues in this bill,” said Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t He said many of the matters in the bill have already been debated and discussed at length.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t