{"id":50824,"date":"2019-07-20T14:30:00","date_gmt":"2019-07-20T22:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/senate-approves-reverse-sweep-and-capital-budget-bill\/"},"modified":"2019-07-20T18:26:55","modified_gmt":"2019-07-21T02:26:55","slug":"senate-approves-reverse-sweep-and-capital-budget-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/senate-approves-reverse-sweep-and-capital-budget-bill\/","title":{"rendered":"Senate approves ‘reverse sweep’ and capital budget bill"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\t\t\t\t
A 19-0 Senate vote Saturday could mean big things for the state’s financial picture depending on what the House and Gov. Mike Dunleavy do next.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
The Senate approved Senate Bill 2002, which funds the capital budget and includes “reverse sweep” language. The sweep is an annual book keeping oddity in which hundreds of millions of dollars in various state accounts are “swept” into the Constitutional Budget Reserve.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
Typically, a “reverse sweep” moves the money back into the original accounts, but the Legislature did not approve a reverse sweep when it sent a bill to the governor.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
“This bill is a do-over, it’s a reset if you will,” said Sen. Natasha von Imhof, R-Anchorage. “I urge a yes vote on this bill.”<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
Her fellow senators did exactly that. <\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
The House Finance Committee voted Saturday to move the bill out of committee, which sets up Sunday as a likely date of a vote. The House is set to adjourn at 1 p.m., and the Senate at 2 p.m.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
Every meeting and session held Saturday primarily focused on the reverse sweep aspect of the bill.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
Sen. Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage, said on the Senate floor Saturday the impacts of that weren’t fully understood at the time.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
Historically, funds that provide college scholarships and subsidize electricity have not been swept, but the Dunleavy administration is examining more wide ranging sweeps.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
“The consequences of not reversing that sweep are pretty stunning and not what many anticipated,” Wielechowski said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
Sen. Lora Reinbold, R-Eagle River, was an ardent voice against voting for the bill, but she did ultimately vote for it.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
“I just got a copy of this bill hours ago, and I do not understand the implications,” Reinbold. “This is a big, important bill for me to understand. I am asking for a recess until my amendments are read.”<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t
She said the bill was put together through back door meetings, which led to Sen. John Coghill, calling for a point of order, and saying the meetings were public and transparent.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t