{"id":50909,"date":"2019-07-22T14:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-07-22T22:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/live-assembly-talks-sustainability-before-smoking-seniors-and-more\/"},"modified":"2019-07-23T09:44:31","modified_gmt":"2019-07-23T17:44:31","slug":"live-assembly-talks-sustainability-before-smoking-seniors-and-more","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/live-assembly-talks-sustainability-before-smoking-seniors-and-more\/","title":{"rendered":"Live: Assembly considers onsite marijuana consumption, assisted living tax break and more"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\t\t\t\t
Summary: <\/strong>Onsite marijuana consumption will be allowed under some conditions. In the case of smokable marijuana, that would be at state-approved sellers in outdoor spaces and edibles would be allowed inside.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t An assisted living development tax break was OK’d.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t A motion to bring repealing a resolution to pursue annexation at the next Assembly meeting failed.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t New JACC and Centennial Hall project proposition discussions were referred to Committee of the Whole.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 10:01 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Edwardson’s motion is to introduce a resolution at the next meeting to repeal the resolution approving annexation.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t The motion failed 3-5.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Gladziszewski voted against it, Triem against it, Becker against it, Weldon against it and Hale against it. Bryson, Edwardson and Edwardson voted for it.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t That means annexation pursuit will continue with filing of a formal petition.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 10 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Weldon said she is sympathetic to Angoon, but Juneau should protect its interests.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “Unfortunately, Angoon is not in a position right now to become a borough, we have waited time to see if that would happen,” Weldon said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Edwardson is interjecting again.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t He is as clearly opposed to annexation as possible. He is not swayed by the model boundary argument.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “They were never meant to establish claims to the land,” Edwardson said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t He said he has spent at least a hundred hours learning about annexation, and it is the Assembly’s job to learn more about annexation.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 9:50 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Bryson said as a new Assembly member he doesn’t know how to feel about what’s being considered.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t He asked if there might be a way to table pursuing annexation in order to receive information.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “I feel like I don’t have enough information to make an informed decision right now,” Bryson said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Triem asked what the process is like going forward.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Palmer said it’s a long process, and if the current resolution stands, there will be an additional public meeting that outlines what annexation means.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Then, there would be a public hearing in front of the Local Boundary Commission, which would then make a recommendation.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t It would then need to be in front of the Legislature in either January of 2020 or 2021, Palmer said, the Legislature could then either take action or let it go through.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “The reason we should annex is why our boundaries were drawn in the first place protecting our ore bodies,” Weldon said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t She said it could mean expansion for mines or the possible creation of a new mine.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t 9:40 p.m.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Hughes-Skandijs said she seconds Edwardson’s comments.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “I would like to take this up as an Assembly,” she said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t She recognized Gladziszewski’s concerns but thinks annexation has large consequences.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “I don’t feel comfortable going forward with this annexation because I feel it’s poor behavior to our Southeast neighbors and the timing really couldn’t be worse,” Hughes-Skandijs said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Hale said she is not an advocate for reversing a prior Assembly’s decision, so she doesn’t support the motion to consider repealing the resolution.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “This is a tough topic, I would really like there to be some kind of public process going on,” Hale said.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Watt said there were public meetings and there has been outreach to Angoon.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t Edwardson said he’s sorry that city employees put so much work into this matter, but he thinks it should be revisited.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t “It’s a bad decision-making process called sunk costs,” Edwardson said. “I have no sympathy for the costs that we have put in… I think this deserves a long discussion, and I think the only way to have the discussion is to make a motion to repeal.”<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t