{"id":68503,"date":"2021-03-07T22:30:00","date_gmt":"2021-03-08T07:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/lawmakers-question-whether-proposed-department-split-is-legal\/"},"modified":"2021-03-07T22:30:00","modified_gmt":"2021-03-08T07:30:00","slug":"lawmakers-question-whether-proposed-department-split-is-legal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/lawmakers-question-whether-proposed-department-split-is-legal\/","title":{"rendered":"Lawmakers question whether proposed department split is legal"},"content":{"rendered":"
Lawmakers are questioning the legality of Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s use of an executive order<\/a> to split the Department of Health and Social Services, saying the move would open the state to costly litigation.<\/p>\n At a House Health and Social Services Committee<\/a> meeting Saturday, lawmakers reviewed a letter from the Legislative Legal Division outlining dozens of instances in which the executive order made substantive changes to existing law, something not allowed by executive order.<\/p>\n Many groups — notably tribal health care groups — have voiced opposition to the split, but in an interview Monday, Sen. Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage, said regardless of the intended effects of the split, the executive order being used to accomplish it is a violation of the state constitution.<\/p>\n “The constitution gives the governor the right to reorganize departments; however, that does not give the governor carte blanche to enact substantive law and that is what he’s doing,” Wielechowski said. “It’s written like a piece of legislation. There are at least 36 different substantive changes that our legislative attorneys have identified.”<\/p>\n Big changes<\/strong><\/p>\n Wielechowski said his argument was not necessarily against splitting the state’s largest department, but against the way the governor was choosing to do it. He pointed to the legal memo<\/a> which says proposed changes such as preventing registered nurses from pronouncing the death of a patient at an Alaska Pioneer Home or Alaska Veteran Home and adding board members to several commissions constitute substantive changes to existing law.<\/p>\n