{"id":81397,"date":"2022-02-04T02:30:00","date_gmt":"2022-02-04T11:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/amount-of-infrastructure-bill-money-coming-to-the-state-still-a-mystery\/"},"modified":"2022-02-04T02:30:00","modified_gmt":"2022-02-04T11:30:00","slug":"amount-of-infrastructure-bill-money-coming-to-the-state-still-a-mystery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/amount-of-infrastructure-bill-money-coming-to-the-state-still-a-mystery\/","title":{"rendered":"Amount of infrastructure bill money coming to the state still a mystery"},"content":{"rendered":"
The state of Alaska is expecting a lot of money from the bipartisan infrastructure bill passed late last year, but much of that funding will go to already existing federal programs and won’t be subject to appropriation by the Legislature.<\/p>\n
Speaking to the House Finance Committee Thursday, infrastructure investment coordinator from Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s office Miles Baker, told lawmakers about half of the money in the bpartisan infrastructure law was going straight to the U.S. Department of Transportation.<\/p>\n
“There’s a lot more that we don’t know than we do know with this bill,” Baker said. “In essence, this bill is a reauthorization of established federal programs, a majority of these funds will come through existing programs.”<\/p>\n
Much of that spending will not necessarily require authorization from the Legislature, Baker said, but it’s reasonable to expect that most of the programs will require “non-federal” matching dollars. Baker said he used the term non-federal because some of the programs may require matching funds from local or tribal governments or even regional utilities. The Legislature could decide to have the state pay for those matching funds, Baker said, which would require legislative action.<\/p>\n
“It seems like we’re going to be observing a lot,” said Rep. Andy Josephson, D-Anchorage, during the meeting.<\/p>\n
Baker couldn’t say how much money Alaska could expect to get because there were so many different programs with different funding schemes. But some programs, in particular the ferry service for rural communities program, have a limited number of states that meet the eligibility requirements, Baker said. Similarly, Baker said, language in the bill states an emphasis on underserved and underdeveloped communities which Alaska has a lot of.<\/p>\n