{"id":82004,"date":"2022-02-17T22:30:00","date_gmt":"2022-02-18T07:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/students-appeal-superior-court-ruling-on-higher-education-funds\/"},"modified":"2022-02-17T22:30:00","modified_gmt":"2022-02-18T07:30:00","slug":"students-appeal-superior-court-ruling-on-higher-education-funds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.juneauempire.com\/news\/students-appeal-superior-court-ruling-on-higher-education-funds\/","title":{"rendered":"Students appeal Superior Court ruling on higher education funds"},"content":{"rendered":"
University of Alaska students on Friday appealed a decision from an Anchorage Superior Court judge that sided with Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s decision to subject higher education scholarship funding to a state accounting mechanism known as “the sweep,” which annually empties state accounts.<\/p>\n
Students argued the decision to subject the Higher Education Investment Fund to the sweep violated state law. The sweep moves funds to the Constitutional Budget Reserve and requires a two-thirds majority of the Legislature to reverse, a vote recent Legislatures haven’t been able to achieve because of political divisions.<\/p>\n
The suit stems from a decision by former Attorney General Kevin Clarkson and former Office of Management and Budget Director Donna Arduin to subject the Higher Education Investment Fund to the sweep, a position not taken by previous administrations. A similar lawsuit rejected the administration’s decision to sweep the Power Cost Equalization fund, shielding that program from legislative impasse.<\/p>\n
In his decision, Judge Adolf Zeman said the PCE fund’s enabling language establishes it outside of the general fund. Zeman also rejected the students’ claim funds were dedicated to various scholarship programs — such as the Alaska Performance Scholarship and Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, Idaho Program at the University of Washington School of Medicine — citing a previous court decision, Hickel v. Cowper.<\/p>\n
“Without further legislative action, the funds in the HEIF stay in the general fund. This interpretation of the HEIF follows Hickel ‘s binding definition of ‘available for appropriation,’” Zeman wrote.<\/p>\n