A row of heavy nuclear missiles. (123rf.com Stock Photo)

A row of heavy nuclear missiles. (123rf.com Stock Photo)

Congress must reclaim the power to declare war

  • By Rich Moniak
  • Sunday, January 28, 2018 7:05am
  • Opinion

Senate Resolution 361 is a long-winded recitation of North Korean offenses that ends with a statement affirming Congress’ constitutional authority to declare war. It wouldn’t be necessary if Congress hadn’t abdicated that solemn responsibility to prior presidents. But if they fail to reclaim it now, America may slide in the annals of history as an uncivilized nation that set off a nuclear war.

U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan was one the six co-sponsors when S.361 was introduced last month. On the same issue, a smaller group submitted S.2016 in October. That had a companion in the House – H.R.4140 – with 61 members on board. The main problem with all three is they’ve been referred to committees where they sit in obscurity. There’s no other action, hearings or serious media coverage about them.

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reported President Trump is considering limited “bloody nose” strikes against North Korean targets in retaliation for any further nuclear or missile tests. And he seems to have little interest in getting congressional authorization before taking such action.

As a candidate, Trump argued it was bad policy to broadcast troop level changes and withdrawal plans in Afghanistan. By extension, projecting unpredictability into the standoff over North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs might be his strategy to keep the enemy guessing. And it would be undermined if Congress was to debate and vote on authorizing it before he could act.

Plus, there are several precedents for him to initiate the attack without congressional authorization.

In 1983, President Reagan invaded Grenada without it. Aside from an impeachment resolution that was never advanced, Congress never challenged him afterwards.

Congress didn’t respond in any way at all after President George H.W. Bush ordered the invasion of Panama in 1989.

In 1999, President Clinton commenced NATO led airstrikes in Yugoslavia with only approval of the Senate. A month after the bombing began, the House voted 427 to 2 against a declaration of war. Instead of submitting articles of impeachment, several members filed a lawsuit. But the court ruled they lacked legal standing to sue the president partly because approval was implied in two related congressional actions.

And more recently, President Obama requested authorization to use military force against ISIS in Iraq and Syria but proceeded without Congress having ever considered it.

What’s different here though is, as acknowledged in S.361, immediately following airstrikes, South Korea and Japan would be the likely targets of North Korean retaliation. A long ground war would follow. Or, in Trump’s words, it could escalate into “fire and fury like the world has never seen,” a possibility CIA director Mike Pompeo declined to rule out this past week. Either way, hundreds of thousands of people will be killed, including tens of thousands of American military and civilian personnel stationed in the region.

In other words, because the military resistance in those other conflicts hardly put Americans or our allies at risk, Congress got away with skirting its responsibility. But in doing so, they clouded the constitutional definition and necessity of a war declaration.

Sullivan is one Senator who recognizes this is wrong.

Still, I believe there’s a serious shortcoming to S.361. It only requires Congress to authorize a “pre-emptive or preventative ground war on the Korean Peninsula.” I don’t understand how an airstrike that’s likely to lead to such a war is not itself an act of war that needs congressional authorization.

The others don’t miss this point. But all three are worthless if the majority in congress leaves such decision making to the commander-in-chief without even a debate.

Following that path may grant the unpredictable posture Trump and his national security team desire. But if anyone thinks the element of surprise is the best approach to ensuring military success, consider America’s outrage in 1941, expressed by President Roosevelt, when Japan “deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace” up to the very day of the attack on Pearl Harbor.

Masking military intentions behind overtures of peace isn’t just deceitful. It’s uncivilized. I believe our founders gave Congress its war-making powers to ensure the president makes an honest diplomatic effort to avoid it. And with two leaders bragging about the capability of their nuclear buttons, abdicating that imperils the entire world.


• Rich Moniak is a Juneau resident and retired civil engineer with more than 25 years of experience working in the public sector. He contributes a regular “My Turn” to the Juneau Empire. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

A preliminary design of Huna Totem’s Aak’w Landing shows an idea for how the project’s Seawalk could connect with the city’s Seawalk at Gold Creek (left). (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: To make Juneau affordable, grow our economy

Based on the deluge of comments on social media, recent proposals by… Continue reading

The White House in Washington, Jan. 28, 2025. A federal judge said on Monday, Feb. 3, 2025, that she intended to temporarily block the Trump administration from imposing a sweeping freeze on trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans, adding to the pushback against an effort by the White House’s Office and Management and Budget. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
My Turn: A plea for Alaska’s delegation to actively oppose political coup occurring in D.C.

An open letter to Alaska’s Congressional delegation: I am a 40-year resident… Continue reading

Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) questions Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Pentagon, during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee at the Capitol in Washington on Tuesday morning, Jan. 14, 2025. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Opinion: Sen. Sullivan doesn’t know the meaning of leadership

Last Wednesday, Sen. Dan Sullivan should have been prepared for questions about… Continue reading

Current facilities operated by the private nonprofit Gastineau Human Services Corp., which is seeking to add to its transitional housing in Juneau. (Gastineau Human Services Corp. photo)
Opinion: Housing shouldn’t be a political issue — it’s a human right

Alaska is facing a crisis — one that shouldn’t be up for… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: In the spirit of McKinley, a new name for Juneau

Here is a modest proposal for making Juneau great again. As we… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Protect the balance of democracy

We are a couple in our 70s with 45-plus years as residents… Continue reading

President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington on Monday, Jan. 20, 2025, following his inauguration as the 47th president. Legal experts said the president was testing the boundaries of executive power with aggressive orders designed to stop the country from transitioning to renewable energy. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
Opinion: Sen. McConnell, not God, made Trump’s retribution presidency possible

I’m not at all impressed by President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed… Continue reading

Juneau Assembly members confer with city administrative leaders during a break in an Assembly meeting Monday, Nov 18, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Community affordability takes a back seat to Assembly spending

Less than four months ago, Juneau voters approved a $10 million bond… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Informing the Public?

The recent Los Angeles area firestorms have created their own media circus… Continue reading

Bins of old PFAS-containing firefighting foams are seen on Oct. 24, 2024, at the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport fire department headquarters. The PFAS foams are due to be removed and sent to a treatment facility. The airport, like all other state-operated airports, is to switch to non-PFAS firefighting foams by the start of 2025, under a new state law. (Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)
Opinion: A change for safer attire: PFAS Alternatives Act 2023

Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also known as PFAS, are man-made synthetic chemicals… Continue reading

Attendees are seated during former President Jimmy Carter’s state funeral at Washington National Cathedral in Washington, on Jan. 9, 2025. Pictures shared on social media by the vice president and by the Carter Center prominently showed other past presidents in attendance. (Erin Schaff/The New York Times)
Opinion: Karen Pence’s silent act of conscience

Last week at Jimmy Carter’s funeral, President-elect Donald Trump and former President… Continue reading