Divest the Permanent Fund

Thinkstock

Thinkstock

Organizations around the world are divesting from fossil fuels, and a lot of the talk is about the moral imperative to do so in the face of climate change. But at this point it may also make financial sense. The Permanent Fund has been losing money on fossil fuel investments, and it is reasonable to expect they’ll lose money even faster in the future.

Divestment is the opposite of investment and is the process of selling off assets for financial, environmental or social goals. Selling and withdrawing assets from fossil fuels represents the fastest growing divestment movement in the world. Currently, there have been $5.58 trillion divested from fossil fuel assets — by individuals, faith-based organizations, retirement funds, governments and other institutions.

In early December, The Alaska Climate Action Network drafted a petition calling on the Board of Trustees of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC) to divest the fund from its fossil fuel assets. With little fanfare or press, the petition garnered 240 signatures in time for a Dec. 12 meeting in Anchorage, with the Board of Trustees.

At the meeting, University of Alaska faculty Richard Steiner and Ceal Smith spoke on behalf of the newly formed Coordinated Climate Action Working Group — a statewide, grassroots coalition working to advance action on climate change. Both made comments to the Trustees; advocating for divesting the Alaska Permanent Fund from its fossil fuel assets.

In November, the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund — a fund worth $1trillion — announced that they would begin considering divesting its holding in fossil fuels. “It’s very significant symbolically because it sends a signal that even the people who make money from oil and gas are coming up with divestment plans,” said Michael Webber, deputy director of the Energy Institute at the University of Texas at Austin.

The recommendation by the Norwegian central bank — which manages the fund — rested “exclusively on financial arguments.” It added, “Climate change and the environment did not even merit an aside – the advice is all about a fund manager maximizing value for their client.”

Alaska’s Permanent Fund is currently worth $62 billion. Fossil fuel investments are $4.9 billion or 7.76 percent of the total fund. Steiner wrote in an email that, “A brief summery of major public oil stock holdings of the Permanent Fund shows that they have in aggregate lost about 3 percent in value ($702 million down to $680 million), over an unspecified time period.” He went on to write, “And the unrealized gains on this amount of money are considerable, in the hundreds of millions. As the market has doubled in the past 6 or 7 years, this substantial amount of money should have increased in value correspondingly as well. Instead, these oil equities have lost value.”

The Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation contains four primary fiduciary duties that are expected of APFC’s Board of Trustees: duty to act prudently, duty of loyalty, duty to diversify investments, and duty to follow law and plan documents. Furthermore, The Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation’s long-term goal is to achieve an average real rate of return of 5 percent.

It would appear that investments by the APFC in fossil fuels are currently not attaining these ends.

Following the Dec. 12, the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation Board of Trustees directed its staff — in a historic move — to prepare an Environmental and Social Governance (ESG) Investment session for a future board meeting.

Beyond making economic sense, divestment in fossil fuels sends a strong message to fossil fuel companies. Scientists tell us that if we are to avoid the worse case scenarios of climate change, and remain below the recommended 2 degrees Celsius global temperature increase from pre-Industrial times, much of the remaining fossil fuel reserves must remain in the ground.

There are 2,795 gigatons worth of greenhouse gasses in the known, untapped fossil fuel reserves. If we want to remain below the 2 C threshold, we can only emit an additional 565 gigatons of greenhouse into our global atmosphere.

Divesting the Permanent Fund makes sound economic and moral sense.


• Bjørn Olson resides in Homer.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

The waterfront area for Huna Totem Corp.’s proposed Aak’w Landing. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Aak’w Landing offers growth opportunities amidst declines in Juneau

Juneau has two bright possibilities for economic development along the waterfront: the… Continue reading

A preliminary design of Huna Totem’s Aak’w Landing shows an idea for how the project’s Seawalk could connect with the city’s Seawalk at Gold Creek (left). (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: To make Juneau affordable, grow our economy

Based on the deluge of comments on social media, recent proposals by… Continue reading

The White House in Washington, Jan. 28, 2025. A federal judge said on Monday, Feb. 3, 2025, that she intended to temporarily block the Trump administration from imposing a sweeping freeze on trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans, adding to the pushback against an effort by the White House’s Office and Management and Budget. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
My Turn: A plea for Alaska’s delegation to actively oppose political coup occurring in D.C.

An open letter to Alaska’s Congressional delegation: I am a 40-year resident… Continue reading

Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) questions Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Pentagon, during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee at the Capitol in Washington on Tuesday morning, Jan. 14, 2025. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Opinion: Sen. Sullivan doesn’t know the meaning of leadership

Last Wednesday, Sen. Dan Sullivan should have been prepared for questions about… Continue reading

Current facilities operated by the private nonprofit Gastineau Human Services Corp., which is seeking to add to its transitional housing in Juneau. (Gastineau Human Services Corp. photo)
Opinion: Housing shouldn’t be a political issue — it’s a human right

Alaska is facing a crisis — one that shouldn’t be up for… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: In the spirit of McKinley, a new name for Juneau

Here is a modest proposal for making Juneau great again. As we… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Protect the balance of democracy

We are a couple in our 70s with 45-plus years as residents… Continue reading

President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington on Monday, Jan. 20, 2025, following his inauguration as the 47th president. Legal experts said the president was testing the boundaries of executive power with aggressive orders designed to stop the country from transitioning to renewable energy. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
Opinion: Sen. McConnell, not God, made Trump’s retribution presidency possible

I’m not at all impressed by President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed… Continue reading

Most Read