Opinion: As a seafood processor, I’m voting No on Stand for Salmon

Opinion: As a seafood processor, I’m voting No on Stand for Salmon

  • By Kevin Gullufsen Juneau Empire
  • Tuesday, September 25, 2018 9:34pm
  • OpinionOpinion

Sometimes, to understand where you’re going, you have to look back and see where you’ve been. The older I get, the more I use history to help me make better decisions for tomorrow. Today, I look at my cannery, Alaska Seafood Company; I look at Auke Bay; and I look at all that we have built in Juneau since I arrived 45 years ago. And let me tell you: most of this would not have been possible under Ballot Measure 1, the cleverly named yet misleading “Stand for Salmon” measure.

Alaska Seafood Company sits today where the old Juneau Ready Mix was. This area was a flood zone near a river — not ideal for building. Years ago, when we acquired this property, we were able to make substantial improvements that allowed us to build our operation.

Under Ballot Measure 1, you’re basically not allowed to change anything — water or land — that could cause harm to areas that could be fish habitat. That makes it pretty clear to me that had Ballot Measure 1 been in place years ago, Alaska Seafood Company would not call 5731 Concrete Way home.

But besides my small business, there is a lot of amazing infrastructure and commerce that wouldn’t be in place today under the fish habitat measure: Fred Meyer, Costco, the Egan drive over the wetlands, the airport expansion, the police station, many of our fire stations and the ferry parking lot, just to name a few.

What I’m trying to get across here is that Ballot Measure 1 is not about environmental protections. To make proposals that can enrich the environment has validity. This proposal doesn’t do that. Instead of making thoughtful improvements to existing fish habitat protections, this measure starts from ground zero and implements enough regulations to send Alaska back to the Stone Age. The people who wrote this clearly don’t know anything about the protections we already have in place.

Frankly, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game has been doing a pretty good job with habitat management. Just because our policies are old, doesn’t make them bad. How about the house you live in? I bet it has gotten old too. Look at all the beautiful historical homes in Juneau. We don’t tear them down. We upgrade them over time. And that’s what we’ve been doing since statehood with our fish management policies.

I know that’s a hard pill to swallow as we look to the low king returns this year. Yes, there are a lot of closures, and that’s part of the management system. We can’t control what happens out in the ocean, but we do what we can here in state waters and land. Everybody is taking a hit on this thing equally and it stinks. But if we let an arbitrary group of Outsiders come in, who know little about the way we manage our fish and game, we stand to lose much more.

Many fish processors go through extensive permitting with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game so that they can discharge guts and gills into the bay. Not a big deal. The crabs like that. So it’s no surprise that earlier this year, Pacific Seafood Processors Association stated their opposition to the measure. Yet the proponents of Ballot Measure 1 argue that this is a good decision for our fishing industry. If this measure was actually designed to increase our fish returns, don’t you think the processors would be for it?

If there were an easy solution we could do here, on land, we would have already done it. Ballot Measure 1 isn’t presenting any ideas that are going to return salmon to the rivers. Ballot Measure 1 is just a bad idea, written by people trying to oversimplify a very complicated issue.

All you have to do is look back at the past 60-plus years to see how a future with Ballot Measure 1 isn’t possible. This isn’t a left or a right argument. It’s not a developers’ argument. This is just a decision we have to make for our communities.

For my community, here in Juneau, I know the right decision. I’m voting ‘No’ on Ballot Measure 1.


• Dick Hand lives in Juneau and is the owner of Alaska Seafood Company. My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire.


More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

The White House in Washington, Jan. 28, 2025. A federal judge said on Monday, Feb. 3, 2025, that she intended to temporarily block the Trump administration from imposing a sweeping freeze on trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans, adding to the pushback against an effort by the White House’s Office and Management and Budget. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
My Turn: A plea for Alaska’s delegation to actively oppose political coup occurring in D.C.

An open letter to Alaska’s Congressional delegation: I am a 40-year resident… Continue reading

Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) questions Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Pentagon, during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee at the Capitol in Washington on Tuesday morning, Jan. 14, 2025. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Opinion: Sen. Sullivan doesn’t know the meaning of leadership

Last Wednesday, Sen. Dan Sullivan should have been prepared for questions about… Continue reading

Current facilities operated by the private nonprofit Gastineau Human Services Corp., which is seeking to add to its transitional housing in Juneau. (Gastineau Human Services Corp. photo)
Opinion: Housing shouldn’t be a political issue — it’s a human right

Alaska is facing a crisis — one that shouldn’t be up for… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: In the spirit of McKinley, a new name for Juneau

Here is a modest proposal for making Juneau great again. As we… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Protect the balance of democracy

We are a couple in our 70s with 45-plus years as residents… Continue reading

President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington on Monday, Jan. 20, 2025, following his inauguration as the 47th president. Legal experts said the president was testing the boundaries of executive power with aggressive orders designed to stop the country from transitioning to renewable energy. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
Opinion: Sen. McConnell, not God, made Trump’s retribution presidency possible

I’m not at all impressed by President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed… Continue reading

Juneau Assembly members confer with city administrative leaders during a break in an Assembly meeting Monday, Nov 18, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Community affordability takes a back seat to Assembly spending

Less than four months ago, Juneau voters approved a $10 million bond… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Informing the Public?

The recent Los Angeles area firestorms have created their own media circus… Continue reading

Bins of old PFAS-containing firefighting foams are seen on Oct. 24, 2024, at the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport fire department headquarters. The PFAS foams are due to be removed and sent to a treatment facility. The airport, like all other state-operated airports, is to switch to non-PFAS firefighting foams by the start of 2025, under a new state law. (Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)
Opinion: A change for safer attire: PFAS Alternatives Act 2023

Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also known as PFAS, are man-made synthetic chemicals… Continue reading

Attendees are seated during former President Jimmy Carter’s state funeral at Washington National Cathedral in Washington, on Jan. 9, 2025. Pictures shared on social media by the vice president and by the Carter Center prominently showed other past presidents in attendance. (Erin Schaff/The New York Times)
Opinion: Karen Pence’s silent act of conscience

Last week at Jimmy Carter’s funeral, President-elect Donald Trump and former President… Continue reading

The Douglas Island Pink and Chum Inc hatchery. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire file photo)
My Turn: Fisheries Proposal 156 jeopardizes Juneau sport fishing and salmon

The Board of Fisheries will meet in Ketchikan Jan. 28–Feb. 9 to… Continue reading