Opinion: Understanding our declaration on Independence Day

Widespread ignorance of U.S. history contributes to gullibility.

  • By Mike Clemens
  • Sunday, July 4, 2021 7:30am
  • Opinion
This public domain image shows a printing of the Declaration of Independence.

This public domain image shows a printing of the Declaration of Independence.

By Mike Clemens

The Fourth of July is a good time to revisit our Declaration of Independence, but there’s some relevant, historic background that is not usually discussed. Rather than just declaring independence from King George III, that document set the stage for greater involvement by France and Spain. Without their help, the 13 colonies had no chance to win a war with England.

Before explaining more, here’s why U.S. history deserves attention. Most Americans don’t know or understand their own history. According to recent analysis:

Fewer than half of American college students in one study could place the Civil War within the correct half century. More than a third of the general public cannot name any rights protected by the First Amendment. Nearly three-quarters of Americans can’t name the three branches of government. Only 12% of U.S. high school students are scored “proficient” in American history. Many elite colleges and universities don’t require undergraduates to study U.S. history.

The “shot heard round the world” was fired on April 19, 1775, over a year before the declaration was signed on July 4, 1776. That proverbial “shot,” when the Red Coats and the Minutemen clashed at Lexington and Concord, started the war. The peace treaty ending that war wasn’t signed until 1783. How did 13 colonies hold off a superpower for all those years? We had help. That’s why the Declaration of Independence, properly understood, was really a declaration of our dependence on England’s historic adversaries for major military and economic support.

The history of Western Civilization tells us that when it comes to fighting wars, the enemy of my enemy is my ally. France and Spain were England’s adversaries; they often battled for world dominance. Colonial America would have had no chance to beat England without foreign help which first came in the form of guns, ammunition and gunpowder. As today’s superpowers engage in nation-building, so did they back then. But there were still limits. It’s one thing to quietly supply the weapons of war to the colonists, it’s quite another to openly provide armies and naval support as well as globally engage the British Empire.

Before full-fledged support of our Revolutionary War, France and Spain needed assurance that they would be fighting to help a new nation gain its independence and not engaging in a civil war. That’s a central reason why the Declaration was written when it was.

The Declaration of Independence was a war-time political statement for multiple audiences. First, it told King George III that his former colonies were now independent. But earlier, in October of 1775, that same king had already told parliament that our “rebellion is manifestly carried on for the purpose of establishing an independent empire.” Second, the Declaration also told Louis XVI of France and Carlos III of Spain that they could now openly support our newly formed nation in its revolt against England. France and Spain had already been helping behind the scenes, but without increased military help, especially from France, we didn’t stand a chance.

The above conclusion isn’t mine. It comes from a 2016 book: “Brothers at Arms: American Independence and the Men of France and Spain Who Saved It,” by Larrie D. Ferreiro. Our statewide library system has six copies of this scholarly, 429-page book. It provides supporting evidence including explicit, written accounts, documentation from key contemporaries, names academic historians recognize. Reading just its 25-page introduction covers the basics, but there’s another option.

C-SPAN’s Book-TV website has a catalog of video presentations searchable by author or title. When asked during a 2017 Q&A about the recent theory (now being promoted by the New York Times) that to maintain slavery, the colonists wanted to revolt against England which was about to abolish slavery, this author had a two-part answer. First, England financially benefited from slavery via its sugar plantations in the Caribbean and then had no plans to relinquish that revenue. Second, his research found no evidence that our Revolutionary War was fought to maintain slavery in the United States.

Americans should learn more about all their complicated, multi-cultural background, but depend upon reliable sources with solid academic credentials.

• Mike Clemens is a former statewide budget analyst. He resides in Juneau. Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire. Have something to say? Here’s how to submit a My Turn or letter.

More in Opinion

Web
Have something to say?

Here’s how to add your voice to the conversation.

A preliminary design of Huna Totem’s Aak’w Landing shows an idea for how the project’s Seawalk could connect with the city’s Seawalk at Gold Creek (left). (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: To make Juneau affordable, grow our economy

Based on the deluge of comments on social media, recent proposals by… Continue reading

The White House in Washington, Jan. 28, 2025. A federal judge said on Monday, Feb. 3, 2025, that she intended to temporarily block the Trump administration from imposing a sweeping freeze on trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans, adding to the pushback against an effort by the White House’s Office and Management and Budget. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
My Turn: A plea for Alaska’s delegation to actively oppose political coup occurring in D.C.

An open letter to Alaska’s Congressional delegation: I am a 40-year resident… Continue reading

Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) questions Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Pentagon, during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee at the Capitol in Washington on Tuesday morning, Jan. 14, 2025. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)
Opinion: Sen. Sullivan doesn’t know the meaning of leadership

Last Wednesday, Sen. Dan Sullivan should have been prepared for questions about… Continue reading

Current facilities operated by the private nonprofit Gastineau Human Services Corp., which is seeking to add to its transitional housing in Juneau. (Gastineau Human Services Corp. photo)
Opinion: Housing shouldn’t be a political issue — it’s a human right

Alaska is facing a crisis — one that shouldn’t be up for… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: In the spirit of McKinley, a new name for Juneau

Here is a modest proposal for making Juneau great again. As we… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Protect the balance of democracy

We are a couple in our 70s with 45-plus years as residents… Continue reading

President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington on Monday, Jan. 20, 2025, following his inauguration as the 47th president. Legal experts said the president was testing the boundaries of executive power with aggressive orders designed to stop the country from transitioning to renewable energy. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
Opinion: Sen. McConnell, not God, made Trump’s retribution presidency possible

I’m not at all impressed by President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed… Continue reading

Juneau Assembly members confer with city administrative leaders during a break in an Assembly meeting Monday, Nov 18, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Community affordability takes a back seat to Assembly spending

Less than four months ago, Juneau voters approved a $10 million bond… Continue reading

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter: Informing the Public?

The recent Los Angeles area firestorms have created their own media circus… Continue reading

Bins of old PFAS-containing firefighting foams are seen on Oct. 24, 2024, at the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport fire department headquarters. The PFAS foams are due to be removed and sent to a treatment facility. The airport, like all other state-operated airports, is to switch to non-PFAS firefighting foams by the start of 2025, under a new state law. (Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)
Opinion: A change for safer attire: PFAS Alternatives Act 2023

Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also known as PFAS, are man-made synthetic chemicals… Continue reading

Attendees are seated during former President Jimmy Carter’s state funeral at Washington National Cathedral in Washington, on Jan. 9, 2025. Pictures shared on social media by the vice president and by the Carter Center prominently showed other past presidents in attendance. (Erin Schaff/The New York Times)
Opinion: Karen Pence’s silent act of conscience

Last week at Jimmy Carter’s funeral, President-elect Donald Trump and former President… Continue reading